Conmat MR 60C vs Universal: the two differ on 26 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Universal Transit mixer), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3750 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 12700 L), Filling Ratio (54% vs 47%). The other 15 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 60C
Universal
Conmat MR 60C
VS
Universal
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C vs Universal: the two differ on 26 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Universal Transit mixer), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3750 kg), Capacity (11100 L vs 12700 L), Filling Ratio (54% vs 47%). The other 15 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 60C
Price Available Soon
Universal
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 60C
Universal
Conmat MR 60C vs Universal: Same Capacity, Different Detail
Both the Conmat MR 60C and the Universal hold the same 6.0 cubic meter nominal filling capacity, so this is not a straight volume contest. The real differences sit in geometric volume, engine information, and water system detail. The Universal has a higher geometric volume at 12700 liters against 11100 liters on the Conmat MR 60C, plus a stated water line volume of 7300 liters.
The Universal also lists a water pump pressure of 3.7 bar and a 300 L/min outlet, figures the Conmat MR 60C's listing does not include for its own pump. What the Conmat does state clearly is its engine: a Kirloskar HA 494 rated at 70 HP, a known name in this segment. Compare both machines against the full concrete mixer range and read the concrete mixer types guide for background on how these mixers are built.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m suits regional project sites
Geometric volume of 11100 L
Features a Kirloskar HA 494 engine with 70 HP
Cons:
Mixer weight empty is 3850 kg, potentially heavier than the Universal model
Lacks detailed information on water pump pressure and outlet
Universal Transit Mixer
Pros:
Ideal for compact urban construction sites with its nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m
Higher geometric volume at 12700 L and water line volume of 7300 L
Water pump pressure of 3.7 bar and outlet of 300 L/min
Cons:
Shell thickness information provided (5-8 mm) but may not be an advantage without comparison data
Larger dimensions (length and height) can be a con for maneuverability in tight spaces
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
With capacity tied at 6.0 cubic meters, let the details decide. If a bigger geometric volume and clear water pump specs matter to your crew, the Universal stands out. If a known engine make like the Kirloskar HA 494 matters more to you, the Conmat MR 60C is the better fit. So match the machine to your work: Universal for buyers who want detailed water system specs, Conmat MR 60C for buyers who want a known, trusted engine.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Universal Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
Universal Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 0.6 cu m. This concrete mixer is ideal for compact delivery needs and improves urban concrete transport efficiency at small construction sites.
Conmat MR 60C vs Universal: Same Capacity, Different Detail
Both the Conmat MR 60C and the Universal hold the same 6.0 cubic meter nominal filling capacity, so this is not a straight volume contest. The real differences sit in geometric volume, engine information, and water system detail. The Universal has a higher geometric volume at 12700 liters against 11100 liters on the Conmat MR 60C, plus a stated water line volume of 7300 liters.
The Universal also lists a water pump pressure of 3.7 bar and a 300 L/min outlet, figures the Conmat MR 60C's listing does not include for its own pump. What the Conmat does state clearly is its engine: a Kirloskar HA 494 rated at 70 HP, a known name in this segment. Compare both machines against the full concrete mixer range and read the concrete mixer types guide for background on how these mixers are built.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m suits regional project sites
Geometric volume of 11100 L
Features a Kirloskar HA 494 engine with 70 HP
Cons:
Mixer weight empty is 3850 kg, potentially heavier than the Universal model
Lacks detailed information on water pump pressure and outlet
Universal Transit Mixer
Pros:
Ideal for compact urban construction sites with its nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m
Higher geometric volume at 12700 L and water line volume of 7300 L
Water pump pressure of 3.7 bar and outlet of 300 L/min
Cons:
Shell thickness information provided (5-8 mm) but may not be an advantage without comparison data
Larger dimensions (length and height) can be a con for maneuverability in tight spaces
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
With capacity tied at 6.0 cubic meters, let the details decide. If a bigger geometric volume and clear water pump specs matter to your crew, the Universal stands out. If a known engine make like the Kirloskar HA 494 matters more to you, the Conmat MR 60C is the better fit. So match the machine to your work: Universal for buyers who want detailed water system specs, Conmat MR 60C for buyers who want a known, trusted engine.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Universal Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
Universal Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 0.6 cu m. This concrete mixer is ideal for compact delivery needs and improves urban concrete transport efficiency at small construction sites.
26 differ · 15 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Universal
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
NA
7300 L
Shell Thickness
NA
5-8 mm
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2450 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6377 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2717 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 60C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 60C
Universal
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
NA
7300 L
Shell Thickness
NA
5-8 mm
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2450 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6377 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2717 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 60C
Universal
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5590 mm
6377 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2717 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
5-8 mm
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
3750 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
NA
Performance
Conmat MR 60C
Universal
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
6.0 m³
Geometric Volume
11100 L
12700 L
Water Line Volume
NA
7300 L
Filling Ratio
54%
47%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2450 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
470 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
3.7 bar
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
300 L/min
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 60C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 60C vs Universal
Ans.
Yes, both list a nominal filling capacity of 6.0 cubic meters. The difference between them shows up in geometric volume and water system detail, not drum capacity.
Ans.
The Universal has the bigger geometric volume, at 12700 liters against 11100 liters on the Conmat MR 60C. A bigger geometric volume can mean more room in the drum for mixing.
Ans.
It runs a Kirloskar HA 494 engine rated at 70 HP. Compare data does not name an engine make for the Universal transit mixer.
Ans.
Yes. The Universal states a water pump pressure of 3.7 bar and an outlet of 300 L/min. Compare data does not include the same pump figures for the Conmat MR 60C.
Ans.
Its listed dimensions run larger in length and height than typical compact mixers, which compare data notes can make it harder to maneuver in tight spaces. Check your site access before choosing.
Conmat MR 60C Vs Universal - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 60C Vs Universal price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
