Conmat MR 70XL
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0+ m³ vs 10.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 5100 kg), Capacity (13040 L vs 17080 L). The other 11 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 70XL
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0+ m³ vs 10.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 5100 kg), Capacity (13040 L vs 17080 L). The other 11 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 70XL
Price Available Soon
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): Lighter Build Against Bigger Batches
The Conmat MR 70XL holds just over 7 cubic metres, stays lighter at 3850 kg empty, and runs a well-known Kirloskar HA 494 engine at 70 HP, with a drum rotation speed up to 14 rpm. The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) holds much more, at 10 cubic metres, with a 17080 litre geometric volume and a 650 litre water tank for cleaning and mixing, backed by a stronger 106 HP engine, though it weighs more too, at 5100 kg empty.
That extra weight and size on the AM 10 (C2) come with real batching power for demanding, high-volume jobs, while the MR 70XL's lighter frame and known engine suit a crew that wants easier handling on tighter or softer sites. Compare more transit mixer sizes at the concrete mixer hub or read the concrete mixer guide.
Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer
Pros:
Nominal filling capacity over 7 cu m, suitable for higher volume batching
Moderate sized mixer length of 5840 mm for better maneuverability
Comparatively lighter empty weight at 3850 kg which may benefit fuel efficiency
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm provides good mixing capability
The engine is a reliable Kirloskar HA 494 with 70 HP (52 kW) power
Cons:
No information on shell thickness which could indicate drum durability
Water line volume not specified which is crucial for estimating concrete workability
Missing water pump pressure specification might affect users' analysis on water system performance
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Larger nominal filling capacity of 10 cu m for heavy-duty operations
Higher geometric volume of 17080 L and water line volume of 10720 L indicate more space for mixing
Water tank capacity of 650 L is larger, beneficial for cleaning and mixing
Increased engine power of 106 HP (79 kW) can handle heavier loads
Mixer width of 2450 mm implies a potentially more stable platform during transport
Cons:
Greater empty mixer weight of 5100 kg could imply less fuel economy
Slightly slower rotation speed of 0-12 rpm compared to Conmat MR 70XL
Lack of engine make information may concern users interested in engine brand reputation and service accessibility
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) pros point to volume and power: a higher filling capacity, a bigger water tank, and a stronger engine for demanding batching. The Conmat MR 70XL pros point to a lighter, more maneuverable build with a known, reliable engine. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) for high-volume, demanding jobs, Conmat MR 70XL for tighter sites where handling matters more.
Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer supports a nominal capacity of over 7 cu m. This concrete mixer is built for higher volume batching while ensuring reliable transport.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer also has a 10 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations.
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): Lighter Build Against Bigger Batches
The Conmat MR 70XL holds just over 7 cubic metres, stays lighter at 3850 kg empty, and runs a well-known Kirloskar HA 494 engine at 70 HP, with a drum rotation speed up to 14 rpm. The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) holds much more, at 10 cubic metres, with a 17080 litre geometric volume and a 650 litre water tank for cleaning and mixing, backed by a stronger 106 HP engine, though it weighs more too, at 5100 kg empty.
That extra weight and size on the AM 10 (C2) come with real batching power for demanding, high-volume jobs, while the MR 70XL's lighter frame and known engine suit a crew that wants easier handling on tighter or softer sites. Compare more transit mixer sizes at the concrete mixer hub or read the concrete mixer guide.
Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer
Pros:
Nominal filling capacity over 7 cu m, suitable for higher volume batching
Moderate sized mixer length of 5840 mm for better maneuverability
Comparatively lighter empty weight at 3850 kg which may benefit fuel efficiency
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm provides good mixing capability
The engine is a reliable Kirloskar HA 494 with 70 HP (52 kW) power
Cons:
No information on shell thickness which could indicate drum durability
Water line volume not specified which is crucial for estimating concrete workability
Missing water pump pressure specification might affect users' analysis on water system performance
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Larger nominal filling capacity of 10 cu m for heavy-duty operations
Higher geometric volume of 17080 L and water line volume of 10720 L indicate more space for mixing
Water tank capacity of 650 L is larger, beneficial for cleaning and mixing
Increased engine power of 106 HP (79 kW) can handle heavier loads
Mixer width of 2450 mm implies a potentially more stable platform during transport
Cons:
Greater empty mixer weight of 5100 kg could imply less fuel economy
Slightly slower rotation speed of 0-12 rpm compared to Conmat MR 70XL
Lack of engine make information may concern users interested in engine brand reputation and service accessibility
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) pros point to volume and power: a higher filling capacity, a bigger water tank, and a stronger engine for demanding batching. The Conmat MR 70XL pros point to a lighter, more maneuverable build with a known, reliable engine. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) for high-volume, demanding jobs, Conmat MR 70XL for tighter sites where handling matters more.
Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer supports a nominal capacity of over 7 cu m. This concrete mixer is built for higher volume batching while ensuring reliable transport.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer also has a 10 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations.
30 differ · 11 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10720 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7500 mm / 8000 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2752 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10720 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7500 mm / 8000 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2752 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7500 mm / 8000 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2752 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
5100 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
24000 kg
Performance
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Nomial Filling Capacity
7.0+ m³
10.0 m³
Geometric Volume
13040 L
17080 L
Water Line Volume
NA
10720 L
Filling Ratio
57%
58.5%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
650 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) carries more, at 10 cubic metres against the Conmat MR 70XL's just over 7 cubic metres.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70XL is easier to maneuver. It is lighter at 3850 kg empty and has a more moderate length of 5840 mm, which helps on sites with less room.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) has the bigger water tank, at 650 litres, useful for cleaning and mixing on longer or bigger jobs.
Ans.
Yes, it uses a Kirloskar HA 494 engine rated at 70 HP, a widely recognized engine make. The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) does not list its engine make.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70XL spins faster, at up to 14 rpm against the AM 10 (C2)'s 12 rpm, even though it carries less concrete overall.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) suits that work better, since its higher capacity, bigger water tank, and stronger engine handle heavier, more frequent batching.
Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
