Conmat MR 70XL VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Conmat MR 70XL vs Conmat MR 60C: the two differ on 8 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Drum Size (7.0+ m³ vs 6.0 m³), Capacity (13040 L vs 11100 L), Filling Ratio (57% vs 54%), Mixer Length (5840 mm vs 5590 mm). The other 33 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70XL

Drum Size

7.0+ m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

13040 L
Filling Ratio

57%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 60C

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

11100 L
Filling Ratio

54%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Conmat MR 70XL vs Conmat MR 60C

8 specs differ, 33 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Conmat MR 70XL	Conmat MR 60C
Drum Size	7.0+ m³	6.0 m³
Capacity	13040 L	11100 L
Filling Ratio	57%	54%
Mixer Length	5840 mm	5590 mm

See all 8 differences ↓

Conmat MR 70XL price & full specs →Conmat MR 60C price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Conmat MR 70XL VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Conmat MR 70XL

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 60C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Conmat MR 70XL	Conmat MR 60C

Conmat MR 60C vs MR 70XL: Which Transit Mixer to Buy?

Both machines run on the same engine. The real choice is how much concrete you move in one trip. The Conmat MR 60C carries about 6 cubic metres of concrete per load and suits regional sites where trucks make shorter, more frequent runs. The Conmat MR 70XL carries more concrete per load, so it works well when your site takes bigger pours and you want fewer trips from the batching plant.

Since both come from the same brand, parts and service are shared, so this is a size decision more than a brand decision. A smaller contractor doing local work may find the MR 60C easier to turn around in narrow lanes and small sites. A large civil job with steady demand for concrete may get more value from the MR 70XL's bigger load per trip. See the full concrete mixer range or read our guide to concrete mixer types.

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m suitable for regional project sites
Mixer length of 5590 mm
Drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Powered by a 70 HP (52 kW) Kirloskar HA 494 engine

Cons:

Less filling capacity compared to Conmat MR 70XL
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 liters

Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer

Pros:

Higher nominal capacity of over 7 cu m, built for larger volumes
Greater geometric volume of 13040 liters
Same drum rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Equally powered by a 70 HP (52 kW) Kirloskar HA 494 engine

Cons:

Longer mixer length might require more space for maneuverability at 5840 mm

Closing Recommendation

Think about how much concrete you move on a normal day and how much room your site has for a bigger mixer. Choose the Conmat MR 70XL when your jobs need more concrete per trip and you have space to move it. Choose the Conmat MR 60C when your sites are smaller or your lanes are tighter. So match the machine to your work: MR 70XL for bigger pours, MR 60C for smaller sites and easier movement.