Conmat MR 70XL
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): the two differ on 28 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0+ m³ vs 9.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4850 kg), Capacity (13040 L vs 15850 L). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 70XL
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): the two differ on 28 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0+ m³ vs 9.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4850 kg), Capacity (13040 L vs 15850 L). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 70XL
Price Available Soon
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) is the bigger machine here, with a 9.0 cubic metre drum, a wider 2450 mm body, and a 4-axle truck base built to carry more load per trip. The Conmat MR 70XL is the smaller, narrower option, riding on a 3-axle truck, which makes it a touch easier to place on narrow roads or crowded sites.
A 4-axle mixer like the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) needs more room to turn but carries more concrete each trip, which suits large, steady projects. The lighter Conmat MR 70XL suits sites where access is tight or fuel economy matters more than raw capacity. Check the full transit mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide for help sizing your next mixer.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 9.0 m³, suitable for large scale projects
Larger geometric volume of 15850 L enables high-volume delivery
Higher water tank capacity of 650 L facilitates better water supply
Drum diameter of 2300 mm which may allow for efficient mixing
More powerful engine at 106 HP providing better performance
Cons:
Heavier mixer weight (empty) at 4850 kg which may affect fuel efficiency
Wider mixer width at 2450 mm could present challenges in narrow spaces
4 Axle truck specification might require larger operational space
Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer
Pros:
Lighter empty weight at 3850 kg potentially offering better fuel economy
Shorter mixer length at 5840 mm could make it easier to maneuver
Narrow mixer width at 2350 mm allows access in tighter spaces
3 Axle truck specification could provide better agility in constrained environments
Higher rotation speed at 0-14 rpm which may lead to faster mixing
Cons:
Lower filling capacity of 7.0+ m³ might not be optimal for larger projects
Smaller geometric volume of 13040 L
Reduced water tank capacity of 450 L which might limit water availability
Smaller drum diameter of 2267 mm
Lesser engine power at 70 HP that might affect overall performance
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these mixers move ready-mix concrete well, but they are sized for different jobs. The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) carries more concrete per trip on its wider 4-axle build, which suits major projects needing steady, large-volume delivery. The Conmat MR 70XL is lighter and narrower, which helps where site space is tight or fuel economy matters more. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) for major, high-volume projects, Conmat MR 70XL for space-constrained sites needing agility.
Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer supports a nominal capacity of over 7 cu m. This concrete mixer is built for higher volume batching while ensuring reliable transport.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer has a 9 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer enables high-volume delivery, making it suitable for demanding infrastructure projects.
Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): Which Transit Mixer to Choose?
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) is the bigger machine here, with a 9.0 cubic metre drum, a wider 2450 mm body, and a 4-axle truck base built to carry more load per trip. The Conmat MR 70XL is the smaller, narrower option, riding on a 3-axle truck, which makes it a touch easier to place on narrow roads or crowded sites.
A 4-axle mixer like the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) needs more room to turn but carries more concrete each trip, which suits large, steady projects. The lighter Conmat MR 70XL suits sites where access is tight or fuel economy matters more than raw capacity. Check the full transit mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide for help sizing your next mixer.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 9.0 m³, suitable for large scale projects
Larger geometric volume of 15850 L enables high-volume delivery
Higher water tank capacity of 650 L facilitates better water supply
Drum diameter of 2300 mm which may allow for efficient mixing
More powerful engine at 106 HP providing better performance
Cons:
Heavier mixer weight (empty) at 4850 kg which may affect fuel efficiency
Wider mixer width at 2450 mm could present challenges in narrow spaces
4 Axle truck specification might require larger operational space
Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer
Pros:
Lighter empty weight at 3850 kg potentially offering better fuel economy
Shorter mixer length at 5840 mm could make it easier to maneuver
Narrow mixer width at 2350 mm allows access in tighter spaces
3 Axle truck specification could provide better agility in constrained environments
Higher rotation speed at 0-14 rpm which may lead to faster mixing
Cons:
Lower filling capacity of 7.0+ m³ might not be optimal for larger projects
Smaller geometric volume of 13040 L
Reduced water tank capacity of 450 L which might limit water availability
Smaller drum diameter of 2267 mm
Lesser engine power at 70 HP that might affect overall performance
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both these mixers move ready-mix concrete well, but they are sized for different jobs. The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) carries more concrete per trip on its wider 4-axle build, which suits major projects needing steady, large-volume delivery. The Conmat MR 70XL is lighter and narrower, which helps where site space is tight or fuel economy matters more. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) for major, high-volume projects, Conmat MR 70XL for space-constrained sites needing agility.
Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70XL Transit Mixer supports a nominal capacity of over 7 cu m. This concrete mixer is built for higher volume batching while ensuring reliable transport.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer has a 9 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer enables high-volume delivery, making it suitable for demanding infrastructure projects.
28 differ · 13 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10010 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7200 mm / 7700 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2730 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10010 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7200 mm / 7700 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2730 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7200 mm / 7700 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2730 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
4850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
21600 kg
Performance
Conmat MR 70XL
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Nomial Filling Capacity
7.0+ m³
9.0 m³
Geometric Volume
13040 L
15850 L
Water Line Volume
NA
10010 L
Filling Ratio
57%
57%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
650 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 70XL vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Ans.
Yes, a 4-axle truck like the Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) generally needs a wider turning circle and more room to maneuver than a 3-axle truck. Check your site's gate width and internal road layout before choosing a 4-axle mixer for regular deliveries.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) has a wider drum body at 2450 mm against the Conmat MR 70XL's 2350 mm. The extra width goes with its bigger 9.0 cubic metre capacity, but also means it needs more clearance when passing through narrow site gates.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) has a bigger water tank at 650 litres against the Conmat MR 70XL's 450 litres. A larger water tank helps when washing the drum thoroughly between loads or adjusting slump on longer routes to site.
Ans.
Yes, the Conmat MR 70XL suits smaller RMC plants well, since its lighter weight and narrower body are easier to run on tighter local routes. It also turns faster at up to 14 rpm, which can help keep smaller, more frequent loads workable.
Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 70XL Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
