Schwing Stetter AM 4
VS
Conmat MR 60C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 4 vs Conmat MR 60C: the two differ on 26 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (4.0 m³ vs 6.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3400 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (7900 L vs 11100 L). The other 15 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Schwing Stetter AM 4
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 4
VS
Conmat MR 60C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 4 vs Conmat MR 60C: the two differ on 26 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (4.0 m³ vs 6.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3400 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (7900 L vs 11100 L). The other 15 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Schwing Stetter AM 4
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 60C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Schwing Stetter AM 4
Conmat MR 60C
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 4: which mixer wins for your site?
The Conmat MR 60C carries more concrete, at 6.0 cubic metres, with a stronger 70 HP engine, built for regional project sites that need a decent volume per trip. The Schwing Stetter AM 4 is the smaller machine here, carrying 4.0 cubic metres with a more compact mixer length, which suits sites with limited space to manoeuvre.
Pick the MR 60C when your projects need more volume per trip and a bit more engine power to match. Pick the AM 4 when the job is smaller in scale and a compact machine that turns easily on a tight site matters more, such as inner-city work or gated colonies where access roads are narrow. See the concrete mixer buying guide or the full transit mixer range.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Larger geometric volume at 11100 L
More powerful engine with 70 HP (52 kW)
Cons:
Heavier empty weight at 3850 kg
Dimensions not fully detailed
Schwing Stetter AM 4 Transit Mixer
Pros:
More compact mixer length at 5000 mm
Water line volume specified at 4600 L
Appropriate for small-scale projects
Cons:
Lower filling capacity of 4.0 m³
Less engine power at 52 HP (39 kW)
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The choice between these two mixers comes down to the scale of the work you take on. Choose the Conmat MR 60C for larger or regional projects that need more volume per trip and a bit more engine power. Choose the Schwing Stetter AM 4 for smaller, local jobs where a compact machine that turns easily on a tight site matters more. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 60C for higher-volume regional work, Schwing Stetter AM 4 for compact, small-scale delivery.
Schwing Stetter AM 4 Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Compact but powerful, the Schwing Stetter AM 4 Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 4 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is perfect for small-scale, efficient concrete delivery.
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 4: which mixer wins for your site?
The Conmat MR 60C carries more concrete, at 6.0 cubic metres, with a stronger 70 HP engine, built for regional project sites that need a decent volume per trip. The Schwing Stetter AM 4 is the smaller machine here, carrying 4.0 cubic metres with a more compact mixer length, which suits sites with limited space to manoeuvre.
Pick the MR 60C when your projects need more volume per trip and a bit more engine power to match. Pick the AM 4 when the job is smaller in scale and a compact machine that turns easily on a tight site matters more, such as inner-city work or gated colonies where access roads are narrow. See the concrete mixer buying guide or the full transit mixer range.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³
Larger geometric volume at 11100 L
More powerful engine with 70 HP (52 kW)
Cons:
Heavier empty weight at 3850 kg
Dimensions not fully detailed
Schwing Stetter AM 4 Transit Mixer
Pros:
More compact mixer length at 5000 mm
Water line volume specified at 4600 L
Appropriate for small-scale projects
Cons:
Lower filling capacity of 4.0 m³
Less engine power at 52 HP (39 kW)
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The choice between these two mixers comes down to the scale of the work you take on. Choose the Conmat MR 60C for larger or regional projects that need more volume per trip and a bit more engine power. Choose the Schwing Stetter AM 4 for smaller, local jobs where a compact machine that turns easily on a tight site matters more. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 60C for higher-volume regional work, Schwing Stetter AM 4 for compact, small-scale delivery.
Schwing Stetter AM 4 Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
Compact but powerful, the Schwing Stetter AM 4 Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 4 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is perfect for small-scale, efficient concrete delivery.
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
26 differ · 15 identical
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 4 vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 4
Conmat MR 60C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
4600 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2200 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5000 mm
5590 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2482 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 4 vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 4
Conmat MR 60C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
4600 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2200 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5000 mm
5590 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2482 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 4 vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Schwing Stetter AM 4
Conmat MR 60C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5000 mm
5590 mm
Mixer Height
2482 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3400 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
9600 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 4
Conmat MR 60C
Nomial Filling Capacity
4.0 m³
6.0 m³
Geometric Volume
7900 L
11100 L
Water Line Volume
4600 L
NA
Filling Ratio
51%
54%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2200 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA
Kirloskar HA 494
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 4 vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Schwing Stetter AM 4 vs Conmat MR 60C
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C carries more. Its nominal filling capacity of 6.0 cubic metres is well above the Schwing Stetter AM 4's 4.0 cubic metres.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 4 is more compact, with a shorter overall mixer length, which helps it manoeuvre on smaller or congested sites.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C has more engine power, at 70 HP, against the Schwing Stetter AM 4's 52 HP, matching its bigger drum size.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 4 suits small-scale, local projects well, since its smaller drum and compact build fit lighter, occasional concrete delivery.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C suits regional projects better, since its larger capacity and stronger engine handle a steadier flow of concrete delivery.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 4 carries a water line volume of around 4600 litres, sized to match its smaller 4.0 cubic metre drum.
Schwing Stetter AM 4 Vs Conmat MR 60C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Schwing Stetter AM 4 Vs Conmat MR 60C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
