Schwing Stetter AM 3 VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Schwing Stetter AM 3

Drum Size

3.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3100 kg
Capacity

6350 L
Filling Ratio

47%
Water Tank

300 L
RPM

0-12 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Conmat Concrete Mixer Truck Price in India

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70C

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

57.80%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add Equipment

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before macking any final decision.

Schwing Stetter AM 3 VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Schwing Stetter AM 3

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 70C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C

Overview Summary

Comparing the Conmat MR 70C and Schwing Stetter AM 3 transit mixers, the MR 70C offers a larger capacity and more powerful engine, whereas the AM 3 boasts a lighter weight and smaller dimensions for better maneuverability in urban settings.

Conmat MR 70C

Pros:

Has a higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ which indicates a larger volume for concrete transport.
Features a stronger engine with 70 HP allowing for potentially better performance.
Equipped with a larger water tank capacity of 450 L which can be advantageous for concrete mixing processes.
Boasts a higher geometric volume of 12100 L for larger mixture volumes.

Cons:

Heavier empty mixer weight of 3850 kg might result in higher fuel consumption.
Details about Shell Thickness, Water Line Volume, and Mixer's Sub-Frame Length are not provided, which may impact the evaluation of durability and design.

Schwing Stetter AM 3

Pros:

Lighter empty mixer weight of 3100 kg could potentially offer better fuel efficiency.
Smaller size could make it more maneuverable in tight urban construction environments.
Has a clearly stated Water Line Volume of 3450 L which provides additional information for mixing efficiency.
Provided Water Line Volume of 3450 L could indicate better mixing performance within its capacity.

Cons:

Lower nominal filling capacity of 3.0 m³, suggesting less concrete can be transported per trip.
Small drum diameter (2100 mm) compared to Conmat MR 70C, which could affect mixing efficiency for larger volumes.
Lower engine power at 52 HP could mean lesser performance under certain conditions.
Smaller geometric volume of 6350 L which means less overall capacity for mixture.

Closing Recommendation

For projects requiring higher volume concrete transport and more powerful performance, the Conmat MR 70C may be the preferred choice. Alternatively, for operations within tighter spaces or urban environments where maneuverability is key, the Schwing Stetter AM 3 might be the better option.

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features


Brand	Schwing Stetter Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Type	Standard Transit Mixer	Standard Transit Mixer
Ex-Showroom Price	Price Available Soon	Price Available Soon
Drum Size	3.0 m³	7.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3100 kg	3850 kg
Capacity	6350 L	12100 L
Filling Ratio	47%	57.80%
Water Tank	300 L	450 L
RPM	0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Quick Overview:	The Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer provides a nominal capacity of 3 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer offers compact concrete transport, making it ideal for tight urban construction environments.	The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.

Overview Summary

Conmat MR 70C

Pros:

Has a higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ which indicates a larger volume for concrete transport.
Features a stronger engine with 70 HP allowing for potentially better performance.
Equipped with a larger water tank capacity of 450 L which can be advantageous for concrete mixing processes.
Boasts a higher geometric volume of 12100 L for larger mixture volumes.

Cons:

Heavier empty mixer weight of 3850 kg might result in higher fuel consumption.
Details about Shell Thickness, Water Line Volume, and Mixer's Sub-Frame Length are not provided, which may impact the evaluation of durability and design.

Schwing Stetter AM 3

Pros:

Lighter empty mixer weight of 3100 kg could potentially offer better fuel efficiency.
Smaller size could make it more maneuverable in tight urban construction environments.
Has a clearly stated Water Line Volume of 3450 L which provides additional information for mixing efficiency.
Provided Water Line Volume of 3450 L could indicate better mixing performance within its capacity.

Cons:

Lower nominal filling capacity of 3.0 m³, suggesting less concrete can be transported per trip.
Small drum diameter (2100 mm) compared to Conmat MR 70C, which could affect mixing efficiency for larger volumes.
Lower engine power at 52 HP could mean lesser performance under certain conditions.
Smaller geometric volume of 6350 L which means less overall capacity for mixture.

Closing Recommendation

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features

Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C
Brand
Schwing Stetter Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Type
Standard Transit Mixer	Standard Transit Mixer
Ex-Showroom Price
Price Available Soon	Price Available Soon
Drum Size
3.0 m³	7.0 m³
Mixer Weight
3100 kg	3850 kg
Geometric Volume
6350 L	12100 L
Filling Ratio
47%	57.80%
Water Tank
300 L	450 L
RPM
0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Quick Overview:
The Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer provides a nominal capacity of 3 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer offers compact concrete transport, making it ideal for tight urban construction environments.	The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

	Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive	P.T.O. /Slave Engine	Slave Engine
Water Line Volume	3450 L	NA
Shell Thickness	NA	NA
Drum diameter	2100 mm	2267 mm
Rotation Speed	0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications	2 Axle	3 Axle
Mixer Length	4600 mm	5840 mm
Mixer Width	2300 mm	2350 mm
Mixer Height	2438 mm	2630 mm
Engine Power	52 HP (39 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine	Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
3450 L	NA
Shell Thickness
NA	NA
Drum diameter
2100 mm	2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle	3 Axle
Mixer Length
4600 mm	5840 mm
Mixer Width
2300 mm	2350 mm
Mixer Height
2438 mm	2630 mm
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimension

	Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame	NA	NA
Mixer Length	4600 mm	5840 mm
Mixer Height	2438 mm	2630 mm
Over Hang	NA	NA
Mixer Width	2300 mm	2350 mm
Truck Specifications	2 Axle	3 Axle
Shell Thickness	NA	NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)	3100 kg	3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)	7200 kg	NA

Performance

	Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C
Nomial Filling Capacity	3.0 m³	7.0 m³
Geometric Volume	6350 L	12100 L
Water Line Volume	3450 L	NA
Filling Ratio	47%	57.80%
Rotation Speed	0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter	2100 mm	2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity	300 L	450 L
Water Pump Pressure	NA	NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet	NA	NA
Water Meter Scale	NA	NA
Drum Drive	P.T.O. /Slave Engine	Slave Engine
Engine Power	52 HP (39 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make	NA	Kirloskar HA 494

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimensions

Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA	NA
Mixer Length
4600 mm	5840 mm
Mixer Height
2438 mm	2630 mm
Over Hang
NA	NA
Mixer Width
2300 mm	2350 mm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle	3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA	NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3100 kg	3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
7200 kg	NA

Performance

Schwing Stetter AM 3	Conmat MR 70C
Nomial Filling Capacity
3.0 m³	7.0 m³
Geometric Volume
6350 L	12100 L
Water Line Volume
3450 L	NA
Filling Ratio
47%	57.80%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm	0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2100 mm	2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
300 L	450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA	NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA	NA
Water Meter Scale
NA	NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine	Slave Engine
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)	70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA	Kirloskar HA 494

Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 3

Schwing Stetter Schwing Stetter AM 3

4.5 rating

Price Available Soon

Schwing Stetter Schwing Stetter AM 6 (C2)

4.5 rating

Price Available Soon

Schwing Stetter AM 3 VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Schwing Stetter AM 3

Conmat MR 70C

Overview Summary

Conmat MR 70C

Pros:

Cons:

Schwing Stetter AM 3

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Closing Recommendation

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features

Conmat MR 70C

Pros:

Cons:

Schwing Stetter AM 3

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Closing Recommendation

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Key Highlights

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimension

Performance

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Specifications

Mixer Dimensions

Performance

Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 3

Popular Comparisons with Conmat MR 70C

Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India

Let's get started

Disclaimer

Compare