Schwing Stetter AM 3
VS
Conmat MR 70C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 3 vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 32 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (3.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3100 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (6350 L vs 12100 L). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 3
VS
Conmat MR 70C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 3 vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 32 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (3.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3100 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (6350 L vs 12100 L). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 70C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 70C
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3
The Conmat MR 70C carries more concrete per trip and runs a stronger engine, so it suits sites that need bigger, steady pours. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is smaller and lighter, which helps it move through narrow lanes and crowded urban sites where a bigger mixer struggles to turn.
These two mixers are built for different scales of work, so think about your site access before you think about total capacity. See full details on the Conmat MR 70C and Schwing Stetter AM 3 pages, or browse the concrete mixer range and our guide to mixer types for more options.
Conmat MR 70C
Pros:
Has a higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ which indicates a larger volume for concrete transport.
Features a stronger engine with 70 HP allowing for potentially better performance.
Equipped with a larger water tank capacity of 450 L which can be advantageous for concrete mixing processes.
Boasts a higher geometric volume of 12100 L for larger mixture volumes.
Cons:
Heavier empty mixer weight of 3850 kg might result in higher fuel consumption.
Details about Shell Thickness, Water Line Volume, and Mixer's Sub-Frame Length are not provided, which may impact the evaluation of durability and design.
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Pros:
Lighter empty mixer weight of 3100 kg could potentially offer better fuel efficiency.
Smaller size could make it more maneuverable in tight urban construction environments.
Has a clearly stated Water Line Volume of 3450 L which provides additional information for mixing efficiency.
Provided Water Line Volume of 3450 L could indicate better mixing performance within its capacity.
Cons:
Lower nominal filling capacity of 3.0 m³, suggesting less concrete can be transported per trip.
Small drum diameter (2100 mm) compared to Conmat MR 70C, which could affect mixing efficiency for larger volumes.
Lower engine power at 52 HP could mean lesser performance under certain conditions.
Smaller geometric volume of 6350 L which means less overall capacity for mixture.
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 70C and Schwing Stetter AM 3 serve different kinds of sites, so there is no single winner here. The Conmat MR 70C carries more concrete and runs a stronger engine, which suits open sites with big, steady pours. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is smaller and lighter, so it handles narrow lanes and crowded city sites with ease. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for large open sites needing bigger loads, Schwing Stetter AM 3 for tight urban sites with narrow access.
Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer provides a nominal capacity of 3 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer offers compact concrete transport, making it ideal for tight urban construction environments.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 3
The Conmat MR 70C carries more concrete per trip and runs a stronger engine, so it suits sites that need bigger, steady pours. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is smaller and lighter, which helps it move through narrow lanes and crowded urban sites where a bigger mixer struggles to turn.
These two mixers are built for different scales of work, so think about your site access before you think about total capacity. See full details on the Conmat MR 70C and Schwing Stetter AM 3 pages, or browse the concrete mixer range and our guide to mixer types for more options.
Conmat MR 70C
Pros:
Has a higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ which indicates a larger volume for concrete transport.
Features a stronger engine with 70 HP allowing for potentially better performance.
Equipped with a larger water tank capacity of 450 L which can be advantageous for concrete mixing processes.
Boasts a higher geometric volume of 12100 L for larger mixture volumes.
Cons:
Heavier empty mixer weight of 3850 kg might result in higher fuel consumption.
Details about Shell Thickness, Water Line Volume, and Mixer's Sub-Frame Length are not provided, which may impact the evaluation of durability and design.
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Pros:
Lighter empty mixer weight of 3100 kg could potentially offer better fuel efficiency.
Smaller size could make it more maneuverable in tight urban construction environments.
Has a clearly stated Water Line Volume of 3450 L which provides additional information for mixing efficiency.
Provided Water Line Volume of 3450 L could indicate better mixing performance within its capacity.
Cons:
Lower nominal filling capacity of 3.0 m³, suggesting less concrete can be transported per trip.
Small drum diameter (2100 mm) compared to Conmat MR 70C, which could affect mixing efficiency for larger volumes.
Lower engine power at 52 HP could mean lesser performance under certain conditions.
Smaller geometric volume of 6350 L which means less overall capacity for mixture.
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 70C and Schwing Stetter AM 3 serve different kinds of sites, so there is no single winner here. The Conmat MR 70C carries more concrete and runs a stronger engine, which suits open sites with big, steady pours. The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is smaller and lighter, so it handles narrow lanes and crowded city sites with ease. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for large open sites needing bigger loads, Schwing Stetter AM 3 for tight urban sites with narrow access.
Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 3 Transit Mixer provides a nominal capacity of 3 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer offers compact concrete transport, making it ideal for tight urban construction environments.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
32 differ · 9 identical
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 3 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
3450 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2100 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
4600 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2300 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2438 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 3 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
3450 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2100 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
4600 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2300 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2438 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 3 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 70C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
4600 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Height
2438 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2300 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
2 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3100 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
7200 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 3
Conmat MR 70C
Nomial Filling Capacity
3.0 m³
7.0 m³
Geometric Volume
6350 L
12100 L
Water Line Volume
3450 L
NA
Filling Ratio
47%
57.80%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2100 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
300 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine
Engine Power
52 HP (39 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA
Kirloskar HA 494
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 3 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Schwing Stetter AM 3 vs Conmat MR 70C
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 3 is smaller and lighter, so it can pass through narrow gates and turn in tight yards more easily than the Conmat MR 70C. If your site has a tight entry or low overhead wires, check the AM 3's dimensions against your gate before you book a larger mixer.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70C carries more than double the concrete of the Schwing Stetter AM 3 in one load. On a large pour, this can mean far fewer round trips between the batching plant and the site, saving both time and fuel over a full day.
Ans.
Full shell and sub-frame data is not listed for either mixer, so a buyer cannot compare drum toughness on paper alone. Ask the dealer directly for shell thickness and warranty terms if drum life is a top concern for you.
Ans.
A small contractor with limited sites and tighter access often finds the Schwing Stetter AM 3 easier to manage and cheaper to run day to day. As work grows to bigger, open sites, a larger mixer like the Conmat MR 70C becomes worth the extra size.
Ans.
A stronger engine, like on the Conmat MR 70C, helps when the mixer is fully loaded and moving on hilly or rough roads. But if most of your routes are flat and short, the smaller engine on the Schwing Stetter AM 3 does the job without extra fuel cost.
Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Schwing Stetter AM 3 Vs Conmat MR 70C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
