Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
VS
Conmat MR 70C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 26 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3750 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (11580 L vs 12100 L). The other 15 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
VS
Conmat MR 70C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 26 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3750 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (11580 L vs 12100 L). The other 15 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 70C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2): which transit mixer fits your work
The Conmat MR 70C carries a bit more concrete per trip than the Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) and runs a well-known Kirloskar engine, which many drivers trust for daily use. The Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) is lighter and simpler to place on a mid-sized site, and its own engine power is stated clearly in the listing. Both machines suit steady, midsize construction work rather than very large or very small jobs, so the real choice comes down to weight, engine trust, and drum size rather than a big gap in what each mixer can carry.
Nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³ suitable for midsize construction jobs
Geometric volume of 11580 L
Drum rotation speed of 0-12 rpm
Engine power of 70 HP, ensuring adequate power for mixing operations
Cons:
Less geometric volume compared to Conmat MR 70C (11580 L vs 12100 L)
Lower filling ratio than Conmat MR 70C (52% vs 57.80%)
No Water Meter Scale information provided
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³
Larger geometric volume of 12100 L
Higher rotation speed of 0-14 rpm, which may facilitate better mixing
Powered by Kirloskar HA 494 engine known for reliability
Cons:
Weighs slightly more when empty compared to Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) (3850 kg vs 3750 kg)
No Water Line Volume information provided
The specific advantage of additional volume may be underutilized for smaller jobs
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 70C carries slightly more concrete and runs a Kirloskar engine that many drivers trust for daily service and easy parts. The Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) is a bit lighter, which can help with fuel use and ease of handling on site. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for drivers who want a known, serviceable engine, Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) for those who want a lighter mixer for midsize jobs.
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) Transit Mixer features a nominal capacity of 6 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is designed for steady batching on midsize construction jobs.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2): which transit mixer fits your work
The Conmat MR 70C carries a bit more concrete per trip than the Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) and runs a well-known Kirloskar engine, which many drivers trust for daily use. The Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) is lighter and simpler to place on a mid-sized site, and its own engine power is stated clearly in the listing. Both machines suit steady, midsize construction work rather than very large or very small jobs, so the real choice comes down to weight, engine trust, and drum size rather than a big gap in what each mixer can carry.
Nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³ suitable for midsize construction jobs
Geometric volume of 11580 L
Drum rotation speed of 0-12 rpm
Engine power of 70 HP, ensuring adequate power for mixing operations
Cons:
Less geometric volume compared to Conmat MR 70C (11580 L vs 12100 L)
Lower filling ratio than Conmat MR 70C (52% vs 57.80%)
No Water Meter Scale information provided
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³
Larger geometric volume of 12100 L
Higher rotation speed of 0-14 rpm, which may facilitate better mixing
Powered by Kirloskar HA 494 engine known for reliability
Cons:
Weighs slightly more when empty compared to Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) (3850 kg vs 3750 kg)
No Water Line Volume information provided
The specific advantage of additional volume may be underutilized for smaller jobs
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The Conmat MR 70C carries slightly more concrete and runs a Kirloskar engine that many drivers trust for daily service and easy parts. The Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) is a bit lighter, which can help with fuel use and ease of handling on site. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for drivers who want a known, serviceable engine, Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) for those who want a lighter mixer for midsize jobs.
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) Transit Mixer features a nominal capacity of 6 cu m. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is designed for steady batching on midsize construction jobs.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
26 differ · 15 identical
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
7250 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
6000 mm / 6200 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2400 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2570 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
7250 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
6000 mm / 6200 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2400 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2570 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
6000 mm / 6200 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Height
2570 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2400 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3750 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
14400 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
7.0 m³
Geometric Volume
11580 L
12100 L
Water Line Volume
7250 L
NA
Filling Ratio
52%
57.80%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA
Kirloskar HA 494
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimensions
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
6000 mm / 6200 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Height
2570 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2400 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3750 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
14400 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Conmat MR 70C
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
7.0 m³
Geometric Volume
11580 L
12100 L
Water Line Volume
7250 L
NA
Filling Ratio
52%
57.80%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA
Kirloskar HA 494
Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2)
Questions buyers ask about the Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) vs Conmat MR 70C
Ans.
Yes, many drivers and fleet owners trust the Kirloskar name because parts and service are widely available across India. The Conmat MR 70C uses this engine, which can make repairs and servicing simpler compared to a mixer with a less common engine make.
Ans.
Not usually. Both mixers carry close to the same amount of concrete per trip, so the difference in drum size rarely changes how many trips you need on a normal job. Pick based on weight and engine trust instead, since those matter more day to day than a small gap in drum capacity.
Ans.
Mixers from well-known brands with common engines tend to sell more easily later, since buyers know parts are easy to find. Both the Conmat MR 70C and the Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) come from established names, so condition and service history will matter more than brand alone.
Ans.
It is slightly heavier when empty than the Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2), so it does need a truck built to carry that extra weight along with the concrete load. This is worth checking with your dealer before you commit to a chassis.
Ans.
Yes, both are built for this kind of job. Neither is meant for very large infrastructure pours or very small repair jobs, so both stay in the same practical range for a working contractor. If your daily work is regular midsize concrete delivery, either mixer will do the job well without needing an upgrade.
Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) Vs Conmat MR 70C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Schwing Stetter AM 6 (N2) Vs Conmat MR 70C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
