Conmat MR 70C VS AJAX AF 7XE Transit Mixer

Conmat MR 70C vs AJAX AF 7XE: the two differ on 29 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs AJAX Engg Transit mixer), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3950 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 12880 L), Filling Ratio (57.80% vs 56%). The other 12 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70C

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

57.80%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

AJAX AF 7XE

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3950 kg
Capacity

12880 L
Filling Ratio

56%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-12 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Conmat MR 70C vs AJAX AF 7XE

29 specs differ, 12 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Conmat MR 70C	AJAX AF 7XE
Brand	Conmat Transit mixer	AJAX Engg Transit mixer
Mixer Weight	3850 kg	3950 kg
Capacity	12100 L	12880 L
Filling Ratio	57.80%	56%
RPM	0-14 rpm	0-12 rpm
Drum Drive	Slave Engine	Seperate Engine Drive
Water Line Volume	NA	8183 L
Drum diameter	2267 mm	2300 mm

See all 29 differences ↓

Conmat MR 70C price & full specs →AJAX AF 7XE price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Conmat MR 70C VS AJAX AF 7XE Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Conmat MR 70C

Price Available Soon

AJAX AF 7XE

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Conmat MR 70C	AJAX AF 7XE

AJAX AF 7XE vs Conmat MR 70C: Which Transit Mixer Suits You?

Both mixers hold a 7.0 cu m load, but they are built around different strengths. The AJAX AF 7XE has a larger geometric volume and a bigger 450 L water tank, so it can carry a little more mixing capacity per trip. The Conmat MR 70C is shorter in length, which helps in tight sites, turns its drum faster, and states a clear 70 HP engine rating so you know its power upfront.

If you want more mixing volume and a bigger water tank, the AJAX AF 7XE fits that need. If you work on narrower sites and want a stated engine power figure, the Conmat MR 70C is the easier fit. Compare more machines in our transit mixer and concrete mixer listing, or read the guide to types of concrete mixers for more background.

AJAX AF 7XE Transit Mixer

Pros:

Higher geometric volume of 12880 L
Rotates at 0-12 rpm
450 L water tank capacity

Cons:

Lacks detailed engine power specs
Mixer Length is greater than Conmat MR 70C, potentially affecting maneuverability
Missing water pump pressure and outlet information

Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Smaller mixer length for potentially better maneuverability (5840 mm)
Higher rotation speed (0-14 rpm)
Specified engine power at 70 HP (52 kW)

Cons:

The lower geometric volume of 12100 L
Missing water pump pressure and outlet information
Lacks details on the length of Mixer Sub-Frame and Over Hang

Closing Recommendation

Both mixers carry the same 7 cu m load, so let your site conditions decide. The AJAX AF 7XE suits buyers who want more mixing volume and a larger water tank on hand. The Conmat MR 70C suits buyers working in tighter spaces who also want a clearly stated engine power figure. So match the machine to your work: AJAX AF 7XE for more mixing volume and water capacity, Conmat MR 70C for tight sites and a known engine rating.