Conmat MR 70C vs Universal: the two differ on 28 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Universal Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 6.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3750 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 12700 L). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 70C
Universal
Conmat MR 70C
VS
Universal
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C vs Universal: the two differ on 28 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Universal Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 6.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 3750 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 12700 L). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 70C
Price Available Soon
Universal
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 70C
Universal
Conmat MR 70C vs Universal: Which Transit Mixer Fits Your Site?
These two mixers are aimed at different job sizes. The Conmat MR 70C carries a bigger 7.0 cu m load on a known 70 HP Kirloskar engine, which suits larger, steadier project work. The Universal carries a smaller 6.0 cu m load but shares full water pump details, including pressure and outlet rate, plus a wider shell thickness range for the drum.
If your projects need a bigger load and a known engine, the Conmat MR 70C is built for that. If you run smaller sites and want clear water pump numbers along with a lower-cost mixer, the Universal is worth a look. Browse more machines in our transit mixer and concrete mixer range, or read the guide to types of concrete mixers.
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Designed for steady operations
Has a balance between output and urban mobility
Nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ suits larger projects
Geometric volume of 12100 L
Filling ratio of 57.80%
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Fitted with a Kirloskar HA 494 engine delivering 70 HP
Cons:
Weight empty at 3850 kg might be slightly higher
Mixer width at 2350 mm
Lack of detailed information about water pump pressure and water meter scale
Universal Transit Mixer
Pros:
Compact size ideal for small construction sites
Moderate geometric volume of 12700 L
Higher water line volume of 7300 L
Has water pump pressure of 3.7 bar and outlet of 300 L/min
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Universal mixers are known for being cost-effective
Cons:
Lower nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³ may limit larger projects
Mixer length of 6377 mm and height of 2717 mm
Shell thickness of 5-8 mm may suggest a range in build quality
Engine make is not specified
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Pick based on the size of work you handle most often. The Conmat MR 70C suits larger, steadier project sites where load size and a known engine matter. The Universal suits smaller, cost-conscious sites where clear water pump numbers and easy handling count for more. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for bigger, steady projects, Universal for smaller sites and tighter budgets.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Universal Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Universal Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 0.6 cu m. This concrete mixer is ideal for compact delivery needs and improves urban concrete transport efficiency at small construction sites.
Conmat MR 70C vs Universal: Which Transit Mixer Fits Your Site?
These two mixers are aimed at different job sizes. The Conmat MR 70C carries a bigger 7.0 cu m load on a known 70 HP Kirloskar engine, which suits larger, steadier project work. The Universal carries a smaller 6.0 cu m load but shares full water pump details, including pressure and outlet rate, plus a wider shell thickness range for the drum.
If your projects need a bigger load and a known engine, the Conmat MR 70C is built for that. If you run smaller sites and want clear water pump numbers along with a lower-cost mixer, the Universal is worth a look. Browse more machines in our transit mixer and concrete mixer range, or read the guide to types of concrete mixers.
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Designed for steady operations
Has a balance between output and urban mobility
Nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ suits larger projects
Geometric volume of 12100 L
Filling ratio of 57.80%
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Fitted with a Kirloskar HA 494 engine delivering 70 HP
Cons:
Weight empty at 3850 kg might be slightly higher
Mixer width at 2350 mm
Lack of detailed information about water pump pressure and water meter scale
Universal Transit Mixer
Pros:
Compact size ideal for small construction sites
Moderate geometric volume of 12700 L
Higher water line volume of 7300 L
Has water pump pressure of 3.7 bar and outlet of 300 L/min
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm
Universal mixers are known for being cost-effective
Cons:
Lower nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³ may limit larger projects
Mixer length of 6377 mm and height of 2717 mm
Shell thickness of 5-8 mm may suggest a range in build quality
Engine make is not specified
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Pick based on the size of work you handle most often. The Conmat MR 70C suits larger, steadier project sites where load size and a known engine matter. The Universal suits smaller, cost-conscious sites where clear water pump numbers and easy handling count for more. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for bigger, steady projects, Universal for smaller sites and tighter budgets.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Universal Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Universal Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 0.6 cu m. This concrete mixer is ideal for compact delivery needs and improves urban concrete transport efficiency at small construction sites.
28 differ · 13 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C
Universal
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
NA
7300 L
Shell Thickness
NA
5-8 mm
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2450 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
6377 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2717 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C
Universal
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Water Line Volume
NA
7300 L
Shell Thickness
NA
5-8 mm
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2450 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
6377 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2717 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 70C
Universal
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5840 mm
6377 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2717 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
5-8 mm
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
3750 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
NA
Performance
Conmat MR 70C
Universal
Nomial Filling Capacity
7.0 m³
6.0 m³
Geometric Volume
12100 L
12700 L
Water Line Volume
NA
7300 L
Filling Ratio
57.80%
47%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2450 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
470 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
3.7 bar
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
300 L/min
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O.
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70C vs Universal Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 70C vs Universal
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70C carries a bigger load, at 7.0 cu m, compared with the Universal's 6.0 cu m nominal capacity.
Ans.
The Universal shares clearer water pump details. It states a pump pressure of 3.7 bar and an outlet of 300 L/min, figures the Conmat MR 70C does not list.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70C has a known engine brand, a 70 HP Kirloskar HA 494 engine. The Universal does not state its engine make.
Ans.
The Universal is better suited to small sites. Its compact size and lower nominal capacity make it easier to manage on tighter jobs.
Ans.
Yes. Both the Conmat MR 70C and the Universal turn the drum at up to 14 rpm, so drum speed is not a point of difference here.
Ans.
Yes, it is generally seen as a cost-effective option. Ask your dealer about loan terms too, since finance is commonly available for transit mixers.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Universal - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 70C Vs Universal price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
