Conmat MR 70C VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Conmat MR 70C vs Conmat MR 60C: the two differ on 10 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 6.0 m³), Capacity (12100 L vs 11100 L), Filling Ratio (57.80% vs 54%), Drum Drive (Slave Engine vs P.T.O. /Slave Engine). The other 31 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70C

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

57.80%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 60C

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

11100 L
Filling Ratio

54%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Conmat MR 70C vs Conmat MR 60C

10 specs differ, 31 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Conmat MR 70C	Conmat MR 60C
Drum Size	7.0 m³	6.0 m³
Capacity	12100 L	11100 L
Filling Ratio	57.80%	54%
Drum Drive	Slave Engine	P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Mixer Length	5840 mm	5590 mm

See all 10 differences ↓

Conmat MR 70C price & full specs →Conmat MR 60C price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Conmat MR 70C VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Conmat MR 70C

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 60C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Conmat MR 70C	Conmat MR 60C

Conmat MR 60C vs MR 70C Transit Mixer: Which One to Buy?

Both are Conmat transit mixers, so parts and service are the same for either one. The Conmat MR 60C carries 6 cubic metres of concrete. It suits regional projects and steady daily work. The Conmat MR 70C carries 7 cubic metres and has a longer drum, so it moves more concrete in one trip for bigger jobs.

Since both are Conmat, the real choice is about how much concrete your work needs in one load, not about brand trust. If your sites are mostly regional and steady, the MR 60C does the job well. If you often supply large sites and want fewer trips, the MR 70C carries more each time. See the full range of concrete mixers or read our guide to concrete mixer types.

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Decent nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m suitable for regional project sites
Rotation speed of 0-14 rpm adjusts to mixing needs
Water tank capacity of 450 L supports mixing operations

Cons:

Shorter Mixer Length compared to Conmat MR 70C might limit concrete volume
Lower filling ratio of 54% indicates less efficient space use compared to MR 70C

Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Higher nominal filling capacity of 7.0 cu m for larger projects
Slightly longer mixer length (5840 mm) accommodates more concrete
Increased filling ratio of 57.80% implies better volume efficiency

Cons:

Potentially better suited for larger sites, possibly limiting utility in constrained urban environments

Closing Recommendation

Both are Conmat mixers, so parts and service are the same either way. The Conmat MR 60C suits smaller, regional projects and steady daily work at a lower running cost. The Conmat MR 70C carries more concrete in each trip, so it suits bigger and more demanding sites. So match the machine to your work: MR 60C for smaller, regional jobs, MR 70C for bigger loads and demanding projects.