Conmat MR 70C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): the two differ on 32 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 10.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 5100 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 17080 L). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 70C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): the two differ on 32 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 10.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 5100 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 17080 L). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 70C
Price Available Soon
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): Sizing Up Two Different Jobs
These two are built for different scales of work rather than competing head to head. The Conmat MR 70C holds 7.0 cubic meters nominal filling capacity and spins its drum faster at 0-14 rpm, useful for keeping concrete moving on shorter, more frequent runs. The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) steps up to 10 cubic meters and a 17080 L geometric volume, built for fewer trips carrying more concrete each time.
That bigger drum on the Stetter comes with trade-offs: a heavier empty weight of 5100 kg, a 4-axle truck requirement, and a slower top rotation speed of 0-12 rpm against the Conmat's 0-14 rpm. The Conmat runs a known Kirloskar HA 494 engine at 70 HP, while the Stetter's 106 HP engine has no listed make. Compare both against the wider concrete mixer range and the concrete mixer types guide for more context.
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Designed for steady operations
Balances output and urban mobility
Has a 7.0 m³ nominal filling capacity, suitable for smaller to medium construction jobs
Provides a higher rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for better mixing
Equipped with a 450 L water tank capacity
Operates with a 70 HP (52 kW) Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Relatively lower concrete payload due to its 3 axle truck specification
Limited by its smaller geometric volume of 12100 L compared to its competitor
Details like shell thickness, water pump pressure and water meter scale are not available
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations
10 m³ nominal filling capacity, making it suitable for larger construction projects
Higher geometric volume of 17080 L allows for more concrete mixing per cycle
Equipped with a larger 650 L water tank capacity
Available with a Drum Drive option of P.T.O. and/or Slave Engine
Higher engine power at 106 HP (79 kW) for potentially better performance
Cons:
Higher empty mixer weight of 5100 kg could result in less payload capacity
Requires a larger truck with a 4-axle specification, which may limit its maneuverability in urban settings
Lower maximum rotation speed of 0-12 rpm which may impact mixing efficiency
Engine make is not specified
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The right pick comes down to project size and site access. Larger construction projects that need more concrete per trip and can accommodate a bigger truck should look at the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2). Smaller to medium projects, especially in urban settings with tighter access, are better served by the Conmat MR 70C. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) for large-volume pours, Conmat MR 70C for medium jobs with tight site access.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer also has a 10 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations.
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2): Sizing Up Two Different Jobs
These two are built for different scales of work rather than competing head to head. The Conmat MR 70C holds 7.0 cubic meters nominal filling capacity and spins its drum faster at 0-14 rpm, useful for keeping concrete moving on shorter, more frequent runs. The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) steps up to 10 cubic meters and a 17080 L geometric volume, built for fewer trips carrying more concrete each time.
That bigger drum on the Stetter comes with trade-offs: a heavier empty weight of 5100 kg, a 4-axle truck requirement, and a slower top rotation speed of 0-12 rpm against the Conmat's 0-14 rpm. The Conmat runs a known Kirloskar HA 494 engine at 70 HP, while the Stetter's 106 HP engine has no listed make. Compare both against the wider concrete mixer range and the concrete mixer types guide for more context.
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Designed for steady operations
Balances output and urban mobility
Has a 7.0 m³ nominal filling capacity, suitable for smaller to medium construction jobs
Provides a higher rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for better mixing
Equipped with a 450 L water tank capacity
Operates with a 70 HP (52 kW) Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Relatively lower concrete payload due to its 3 axle truck specification
Limited by its smaller geometric volume of 12100 L compared to its competitor
Details like shell thickness, water pump pressure and water meter scale are not available
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations
10 m³ nominal filling capacity, making it suitable for larger construction projects
Higher geometric volume of 17080 L allows for more concrete mixing per cycle
Equipped with a larger 650 L water tank capacity
Available with a Drum Drive option of P.T.O. and/or Slave Engine
Higher engine power at 106 HP (79 kW) for potentially better performance
Cons:
Higher empty mixer weight of 5100 kg could result in less payload capacity
Requires a larger truck with a 4-axle specification, which may limit its maneuverability in urban settings
Lower maximum rotation speed of 0-12 rpm which may impact mixing efficiency
Engine make is not specified
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
The right pick comes down to project size and site access. Larger construction projects that need more concrete per trip and can accommodate a bigger truck should look at the Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2). Smaller to medium projects, especially in urban settings with tighter access, are better served by the Conmat MR 70C. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) for large-volume pours, Conmat MR 70C for medium jobs with tight site access.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer also has a 10 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is optimized for consistent concrete batching in heavy-duty operations.
32 differ · 9 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10720 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7500 mm / 8000 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2752 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10720 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7500 mm / 8000 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2752 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7500 mm / 8000 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2752 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
5100 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
24000 kg
Performance
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Nomial Filling Capacity
7.0 m³
10.0 m³
Geometric Volume
12100 L
17080 L
Water Line Volume
NA
10720 L
Filling Ratio
57.80%
58.5%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
650 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2)
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) has the bigger drum, with a 10 cubic meter nominal filling capacity against 7.0 cubic meters on the Conmat MR 70C. Its geometric volume is also larger at 17080 liters.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) needs a 4-axle truck, while the Conmat MR 70C runs on a 3-axle truck. The Stetter's higher capacity and 5100 kg empty weight are behind that requirement.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70C spins faster, reaching 0-14 rpm against 0-12 rpm on the Stetter AM 10. A faster spin can help keep concrete workable during transport.
Ans.
It runs a Kirloskar HA 494 engine rated at 70 HP. Compare data does not name an engine make for the Schwing Stetter AM 10, though its rated power is higher at 106 HP.
Ans.
Yes, its 3-axle truck and smaller footprint make it easier to move through narrow city streets and tight gates than the 4-axle Schwing Stetter AM 10.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 10 (C2) price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
