Conmat MR 70C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): the two differ on 32 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 9.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4850 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 15850 L). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 70C
VS
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): the two differ on 32 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 9.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4850 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 15850 L). The other 9 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Conmat MR 70C
Price Available Soon
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): Which One to Buy?
Beyond drum size, the route you drive matters just as much when picking a transit mixer. The Conmat MR 70C is lighter and shorter, which helps it turn into narrow city lanes and low-headroom sites without trouble. The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) carries a bigger batch per trip, so it can suit RMC plants sending concrete to large highway or building sites where fewer, bigger trips save time.
A ready-mix plant serving crowded city projects may prefer the Conmat for easier access and simpler manoeuvring around parked vehicles. A plant supplying big infrastructure jobs may prefer the Schwing Stetter for higher volume per run, since fewer trips mean less driver fatigue over a long shift. See the full concrete mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide before you decide which drum size fits your delivery pattern.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 9.0 m³ allows for larger batch delivery
Increased geometric volume of 15850 L
Higher engine power at 106 HP (79 kW)
Larger water tank capacity of 650 L
Suitable for demanding infrastructure projects due to its high-volume delivery
Wider mixer width of 2450 mm, which might limit accessibility in tighter spaces
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
More compact mixer length of 5840 mm which is ideal for urban environments
Lower empty mixer weight of 3850 kg which may provide better fuel efficiency
Features a Kirloskar HA 494 engine known for reliability
Designed for steady operations with a nominal capacity of 7.0 m³
Cons:
Smaller nominal filling capacity and geometric volume than the Schwing Stetter AM 9
Lesser water tank capacity at 450 L
Lower engine power at 70 HP (52 kW), which may result in reduced performance in heavy-duty tasks
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both transit mixers can deliver ready-mix concrete reliably, but they suit different kinds of routes. The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) carries a bigger batch and runs a more powerful engine, which suits large infrastructure projects that need higher volume per trip. The Conmat MR 70C is lighter and more compact, which suits tighter city routes and smaller daily jobs. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 9 for high-volume highway and industrial deliveries, Conmat MR 70C for nimble city and local site runs.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer has a 9 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer enables high-volume delivery, making it suitable for demanding infrastructure projects.
Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2): Which One to Buy?
Beyond drum size, the route you drive matters just as much when picking a transit mixer. The Conmat MR 70C is lighter and shorter, which helps it turn into narrow city lanes and low-headroom sites without trouble. The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) carries a bigger batch per trip, so it can suit RMC plants sending concrete to large highway or building sites where fewer, bigger trips save time.
A ready-mix plant serving crowded city projects may prefer the Conmat for easier access and simpler manoeuvring around parked vehicles. A plant supplying big infrastructure jobs may prefer the Schwing Stetter for higher volume per run, since fewer trips mean less driver fatigue over a long shift. See the full concrete mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide before you decide which drum size fits your delivery pattern.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Pros:
Higher nominal filling capacity of 9.0 m³ allows for larger batch delivery
Increased geometric volume of 15850 L
Higher engine power at 106 HP (79 kW)
Larger water tank capacity of 650 L
Suitable for demanding infrastructure projects due to its high-volume delivery
Wider mixer width of 2450 mm, which might limit accessibility in tighter spaces
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
More compact mixer length of 5840 mm which is ideal for urban environments
Lower empty mixer weight of 3850 kg which may provide better fuel efficiency
Features a Kirloskar HA 494 engine known for reliability
Designed for steady operations with a nominal capacity of 7.0 m³
Cons:
Smaller nominal filling capacity and geometric volume than the Schwing Stetter AM 9
Lesser water tank capacity at 450 L
Lower engine power at 70 HP (52 kW), which may result in reduced performance in heavy-duty tasks
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both transit mixers can deliver ready-mix concrete reliably, but they suit different kinds of routes. The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) carries a bigger batch and runs a more powerful engine, which suits large infrastructure projects that need higher volume per trip. The Conmat MR 70C is lighter and more compact, which suits tighter city routes and smaller daily jobs. So match the machine to your work: Schwing Stetter AM 9 for high-volume highway and industrial deliveries, Conmat MR 70C for nimble city and local site runs.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer has a 9 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer enables high-volume delivery, making it suitable for demanding infrastructure projects.
32 differ · 9 identical
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10010 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7200 mm / 7700 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2730 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Key highlights: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
NA
10010 L
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7200 mm / 7700 mm
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2730 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5840 mm
7200 mm / 7700 mm
Mixer Height
2630 mm
2730 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2350 mm
2450 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
4 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
4850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
NA
21600 kg
Performance
Conmat MR 70C
Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Nomial Filling Capacity
7.0 m³
9.0 m³
Geometric Volume
12100 L
15850 L
Water Line Volume
NA
10010 L
Filling Ratio
57.80%
57%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-12 rpm
Drum Diameter
2267 mm
2300 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
650 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
106 HP (79 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
NA
Full specifications: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2)
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70C is easier to drive in narrow streets. Its shorter mixer length and lighter build make it simpler to turn and reverse in crowded urban lanes, which matters when delivering concrete to city building sites with tight access roads.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) needs fewer trips, since it carries a bigger batch per load. On a large highway or industrial pour, fewer trips mean less time lost in traffic and a steadier supply of concrete to the site.
Ans.
Yes. A heavier loaded mixer may face restrictions on some rural roads, bridges or inside city limits during certain hours. Always check local transport rules for your route before committing either mixer to a regular delivery run.
Ans.
This depends on your delivery mix. A plant serving many small city sites benefits from more compact mixers like the Conmat MR 70C for flexible daily runs. A plant focused on fewer, larger orders may get more value from higher-capacity mixers like the Schwing Stetter AM 9.
Ans.
Both mixers use a rotating drum designed to keep concrete workable during transport. On longer routes, drum speed control and driving smoothness matter more than brand, so train your drivers to avoid sudden stops that can affect the mix on either machine.
Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Conmat MR 70C Vs Schwing Stetter AM 9 (C2) price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
