Conmat MR 70C VS Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Transit Mixer

Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2): the two differ on 30 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Conmat Transit mixer vs Schwing Stetter Transit mixer), Drum Size (7.0 m³ vs 8.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3850 kg vs 4500 kg), Capacity (12100 L vs 14170 L). The other 11 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70C

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

57.80%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)

Drum Size

8.0 m³
Mixer Weight

4500 kg
Capacity

14170 L
Filling Ratio

56.5%
Water Tank

650 L
RPM

0-12 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)

30 specs differ, 11 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Conmat MR 70C	Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Brand	Conmat Transit mixer	Schwing Stetter Transit mixer
Drum Size	7.0 m³	8.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3850 kg	4500 kg
Capacity	12100 L	14170 L
Filling Ratio	57.80%	56.5%
Water Tank	450 L	650 L
RPM	0-14 rpm	0-12 rpm
Drum Drive	Slave Engine	P.T.O. /Slave Engine

See all 30 differences ↓

Conmat MR 70C price & full specs →Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Conmat MR 70C VS Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Conmat MR 70C

Price Available Soon

Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Conmat MR 70C	Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)

Conmat MR 70C vs Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2): Urban Mobility or Bigger Capacity?

The Conmat MR 70C is built to balance output with urban mobility, holding 7.0 cubic meters nominal filling capacity, a drum rotation range of 0-14 rpm, and a 450 L water tank, powered by a named Kirloskar HA 494 engine at 70 HP. The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) steps up to 8.0 cubic meters, a bigger 14170 L geometric volume, a wider 2450 mm mixer width, a 650 L water tank, and a stronger 106 HP engine, though compare data does not name its engine make.

Weight and width tell a smaller-versus-bigger story: the Conmat MR 70C is narrower at 2350 mm, while the Stetter AM 8 (C2) runs heavier at 4500 kg empty and comes in longer length options of 6800 mm or 7250 mm, which can affect maneuvering in tighter spaces. Compare more options on the concrete mixer hub and the concrete mixer types guide.

Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Balances output with urban mobility
Nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m suitable for standard operations
Drum rotation speed range of 0-14 rpm allows for efficient mixing
Includes a 450 L water tank capacity
Powered by a 70 HP Kirloskar HA 494 engine

Cons:

Mixer weight when empty is considerably high at 3850 kg
Mixer width is narrower at 2350 mm which could affect stability
Geometric volume of 12100 L is less compared to Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Lacks specific engine make details for potential buyers seeking that information

Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Transit Mixer

Pros:

Higher nominal filling capacity of 8.0 cu m for larger projects
Greater geometric volume of 14170 L for more concrete per trip
Wider mixer width of 2450 mm for potentially better stability
Larger water tank capacity of 650 L is advantageous for onsite operations
More powerful engine rated at 106 HP for demanding tasks

Cons:

Higher empty weight of 4500 kg, which could impact fuel efficiency
Slightly slower drum rotation speed of 0-12 rpm which may affect mixing
Longer mixer length options of 6800 mm / 7250 mm may reduce maneuverability in tight spaces
No specific engine make provided which can be a drawback for some users

Closing Recommendation

Site access and job scale should decide this one. Urban settings with moderate construction tasks that need easier maneuvering are better served by the Conmat MR 70C. Larger jobs that need a higher volume of mixed concrete and more engine power are better served by the Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2). So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for urban sites needing easier maneuvering, Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) for larger jobs needing more capacity and power.