Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
VS
Conmat MR 60C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) vs Conmat MR 60C: the two differ on 28 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (8.0 m³ vs 6.0 m³), Mixer Weight (4500 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (14170 L vs 11100 L). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
VS
Conmat MR 60C
Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) vs Conmat MR 60C: the two differ on 28 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Schwing Stetter Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (8.0 m³ vs 6.0 m³), Mixer Weight (4500 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (14170 L vs 11100 L). The other 13 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 60C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2): Which Transit Mixer Suits Your Project?
The Conmat MR 60C carries 6 cubic metres of concrete and runs a modest 70 HP engine, making it a good fit for regional or mid-size project sites. The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) carries more, at 8 cubic metres, and runs a stronger 106 HP engine, so it handles bigger, continuous pours with less strain.
Choose the Conmat MR 60C when your project sites are moderate in size and you want a mixer that is simple and economical to run. Choose the Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) when your work calls for higher volume and steady engine performance across a busy day. Browse all transit mixers or read the concrete mixer guide to compare mixer classes.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Truck
Pros:
Adequate nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m for regional project sites
Decent rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for mixing concrete
Equipped with a 450 L water tank capacity
Powered by a 70 HP (52 kW) Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 liters as compared to competitor
Less engine power than the Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Mixer weight (empty) is less indicating possibly lighter construction
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Concrete Truck Mixer
Pros:
Increased nominal capacity of 8 cu m ideal for larger construction needs
Higher engine power at 106 HP (79 kW) for potentially better performance
Greater geometric volume at 14170 liters than the Conmat MR 60C
Larger water tank capacity of 650 L which can be advantageous on sites
Cons:
Heavier mixer weight (empty) at 4500 kg may affect fuel consumption
Slightly lower rotation speed of 0-12 rpm compared to the Conmat MR 60C
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both mixers move ready-mix concrete, just for different project scales. The Conmat MR 60C suits moderate, regional project sites with its 6 cubic metre capacity and simple Kirloskar engine. The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) suits larger, continuous construction work with its bigger drum, stronger engine and larger water tank. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 60C for regional, mid-size sites, Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) for larger, high-volume projects.
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Transit Mixer comes with an 8 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is built for logistics efficiency and reliable concrete transport.
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
Conmat MR 60C vs Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2): Which Transit Mixer Suits Your Project?
The Conmat MR 60C carries 6 cubic metres of concrete and runs a modest 70 HP engine, making it a good fit for regional or mid-size project sites. The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) carries more, at 8 cubic metres, and runs a stronger 106 HP engine, so it handles bigger, continuous pours with less strain.
Choose the Conmat MR 60C when your project sites are moderate in size and you want a mixer that is simple and economical to run. Choose the Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) when your work calls for higher volume and steady engine performance across a busy day. Browse all transit mixers or read the concrete mixer guide to compare mixer classes.
Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Truck
Pros:
Adequate nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m for regional project sites
Decent rotation speed of 0-14 rpm for mixing concrete
Equipped with a 450 L water tank capacity
Powered by a 70 HP (52 kW) Kirloskar HA 494 engine
Cons:
Smaller geometric volume of 11100 liters as compared to competitor
Less engine power than the Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Mixer weight (empty) is less indicating possibly lighter construction
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Concrete Truck Mixer
Pros:
Increased nominal capacity of 8 cu m ideal for larger construction needs
Higher engine power at 106 HP (79 kW) for potentially better performance
Greater geometric volume at 14170 liters than the Conmat MR 60C
Larger water tank capacity of 650 L which can be advantageous on sites
Cons:
Heavier mixer weight (empty) at 4500 kg may affect fuel consumption
Slightly lower rotation speed of 0-12 rpm compared to the Conmat MR 60C
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Both mixers move ready-mix concrete, just for different project scales. The Conmat MR 60C suits moderate, regional project sites with its 6 cubic metre capacity and simple Kirloskar engine. The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) suits larger, continuous construction work with its bigger drum, stronger engine and larger water tank. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 60C for regional, mid-size sites, Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) for larger, high-volume projects.
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Transit Mixer comes with an 8 cu m nominal capacity. This Schwing Stetter concrete mixer is built for logistics efficiency and reliable concrete transport.
The Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m, making this concrete mixer efficient for transporting concrete on regional project sites.
28 differ · 13 identical
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
9200 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
6800 mm / 7250 mm
5590 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2738 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
9200 L
NA
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Drum diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
6800 mm / 7250 mm
5590 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2738 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
6800 mm / 7250 mm
5590 mm
Mixer Height
2738 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
4500 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
19200 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Nomial Filling Capacity
8.0 m³
6.0 m³
Geometric Volume
14170 L
11100 L
Water Line Volume
9200 L
NA
Filling Ratio
56.5%
54%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
650 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA
Kirloskar HA 494
Full specifications: Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) vs Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimensions
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
6800 mm / 7250 mm
5590 mm
Mixer Height
2738 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
NA
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
4500 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
19200 kg
NA
Performance
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Conmat MR 60C
Nomial Filling Capacity
8.0 m³
6.0 m³
Geometric Volume
14170 L
11100 L
Water Line Volume
9200 L
NA
Filling Ratio
56.5%
54%
Rotation Speed
0-12 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2300 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
650 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Engine Power
106 HP (79 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
NA
Kirloskar HA 494
Popular Comparisons with Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)
Questions buyers ask about the Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) vs Conmat MR 60C
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) carries more concrete, at 8 cubic metres against the Conmat MR 60C's 6 cubic metres. The extra capacity suits bigger, continuous construction projects.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) has a stronger engine, at 106 HP against the Conmat MR 60C's 70 HP. More power helps maintain speed on longer or hillier delivery routes.
Ans.
Yes, the Conmat MR 60C suits regional project sites well. Its moderate 6 cubic metre capacity and Kirloskar engine match steady, mid-size delivery needs without extra bulk.
Ans.
The Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) holds more water onboard, at 650 litres against the Conmat MR 60C's 450 litres. Extra water helps with drum washdown between longer runs.
Ans.
The Conmat MR 60C spins its drum faster, up to 14 rpm against the Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2)'s 12 rpm. A faster spin can help keep smaller loads workable during shorter hauls.
Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Schwing Stetter AM 8 (C2) Vs Conmat MR 60C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
