Venus 6.0 vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 22 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Venus Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Capacity (12000 L vs 12100 L), Filling Ratio (52.00% vs 57.80%). The other 19 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer
The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.
Key Highlights
Venus 6.0
Conmat MR 70C
Venus 6.0
VS
Conmat MR 70C
Transit Mixer
Venus 6.0 vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 22 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Venus Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Capacity (12000 L vs 12100 L), Filling Ratio (52.00% vs 57.80%). The other 19 specs are the same.
Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026
Venus 6.0
Price Available Soon
Conmat MR 70C
Price Available Soon
Particulars
Venus 6.0
Conmat MR 70C
Conmat MR 70C vs Venus 6.0: Capacity Versus Build Detail
The Conmat MR 70C carries a bit more per trip, at 7.0 cubic meters nominal filling capacity against 6.0 cubic meters on the Venus 6.0, with a geometric volume of 12100 liters. Its drum drive runs on a slave engine, which can help keep fuel use down compared to some other setups.
The Venus 6.0 answers with more disclosed build detail: a shell thickness of 5-6 mm, a stated water line volume of 7500 liters, and a named drum drive setup using Rexroth, PMP, or EATON components. Compare data does not give the same shell thickness or water line figures for the Conmat MR 70C, so a buyer who wants that clarity before ordering should factor it in. Check the wider concrete mixer range and the concrete mixer types guide for more background.
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Slightly larger nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ compared to Venus 6.0
The geometric volume of 12100 L allows for efficient mixing
Uses a slave engine for drum drive which can be more fuel-efficient
Cons:
No shell thickness specification provided
Mixer Weight with Concrete is not specified
Does not mention Water Line Volume
Venus 6.0 Transit Mixer
Pros:
Shell thickness is specified (5-6 mm) indicating robust construction
Nominal filling capacity is 6.0 m³ which is less than Conmat MR 70C
Slightly larger mixer width could pose challenges in narrower spaces
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Base the choice on what matters more for your project: raw capacity or build detail you can verify upfront. If a larger load per trip and potentially lower running costs matter most, the Conmat MR 70C fits better. If shell thickness, water line volume, and a named drum drive setup matter more, the Venus 6.0 is the stronger pick. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for higher capacity per trip, Venus 6.0 for buyers who want detailed build specs upfront.
Venus 6.0 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Venus 6.0 Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m. This Venus concrete mixer supports medium-size site batching with reliable mixing and transit performance.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
Conmat MR 70C vs Venus 6.0: Capacity Versus Build Detail
The Conmat MR 70C carries a bit more per trip, at 7.0 cubic meters nominal filling capacity against 6.0 cubic meters on the Venus 6.0, with a geometric volume of 12100 liters. Its drum drive runs on a slave engine, which can help keep fuel use down compared to some other setups.
The Venus 6.0 answers with more disclosed build detail: a shell thickness of 5-6 mm, a stated water line volume of 7500 liters, and a named drum drive setup using Rexroth, PMP, or EATON components. Compare data does not give the same shell thickness or water line figures for the Conmat MR 70C, so a buyer who wants that clarity before ordering should factor it in. Check the wider concrete mixer range and the concrete mixer types guide for more background.
Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Pros:
Slightly larger nominal filling capacity of 7.0 m³ compared to Venus 6.0
The geometric volume of 12100 L allows for efficient mixing
Uses a slave engine for drum drive which can be more fuel-efficient
Cons:
No shell thickness specification provided
Mixer Weight with Concrete is not specified
Does not mention Water Line Volume
Venus 6.0 Transit Mixer
Pros:
Shell thickness is specified (5-6 mm) indicating robust construction
Nominal filling capacity is 6.0 m³ which is less than Conmat MR 70C
Slightly larger mixer width could pose challenges in narrower spaces
Pros:
Cons:
Closing Recommendation
Base the choice on what matters more for your project: raw capacity or build detail you can verify upfront. If a larger load per trip and potentially lower running costs matter most, the Conmat MR 70C fits better. If shell thickness, water line volume, and a named drum drive setup matter more, the Venus 6.0 is the stronger pick. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for higher capacity per trip, Venus 6.0 for buyers who want detailed build specs upfront.
Venus 6.0 Vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer Price, Technical Specifications & Features
The Venus 6.0 Transit Mixer has a nominal capacity of 6.0 cu m. This Venus concrete mixer supports medium-size site batching with reliable mixing and transit performance.
The Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer is designed for steady operations and has a nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m. This concrete mixer balances output and urban mobility needs.
22 differ · 19 identical
Key highlights: Venus 6.0 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Venus 6.0
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
Rexroth/PMP/EATON)
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
7500 L
NA
Shell Thickness
5-6 mm
NA
Drum diameter
2350 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5853 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2665 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Key highlights: Venus 6.0 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Venus 6.0
Conmat MR 70C
Drum Drive
Rexroth/PMP/EATON)
Slave Engine
Water Line Volume
7500 L
NA
Shell Thickness
5-6 mm
NA
Drum diameter
2350 mm
2267 mm
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Mixer Length
5853 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Mixer Height
2665 mm
2630 mm
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Full specifications: Venus 6.0 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Mixer Dimension
Venus 6.0
Conmat MR 70C
Length of Mixer Sub Frame
NA
NA
Mixer Length
5853 mm
5840 mm
Mixer Height
2665 mm
2630 mm
Over Hang
NA
NA
Mixer Width
2450 mm
2350 mm
Truck Specifications
3 Axle
3 Axle
Shell Thickness
5-6 mm
NA
Mixer Weight (Empty)
3850 kg
3850 kg
Mixer Weight (Concrete)
14400 kg
NA
Performance
Venus 6.0
Conmat MR 70C
Nomial Filling Capacity
6.0 m³
7.0 m³
Geometric Volume
12000 L
12100 L
Water Line Volume
7500 L
NA
Filling Ratio
52.00%
57.80%
Rotation Speed
0-14 rpm
0-14 rpm
Drum Diameter
2350 mm
2267 mm
Water Tank Capacity
450 L
450 L
Water Pump Pressure
NA
NA
Water Tank Pump Outlet
NA
NA
Water Meter Scale
NA
NA
Drum Drive
Rexroth/PMP/EATON)
Slave Engine
Engine Power
70 HP (52 kW)
70 HP (52 kW)
Engine Make
Kirloskar HA 494
Kirloskar HA 494
Full specifications: Venus 6.0 vs Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer
Questions buyers ask about the Venus 6.0 vs Conmat MR 70C
Ans.
The Conmat MR 70C has slightly more capacity, at 7.0 cubic meters against 6.0 cubic meters on the Venus 6.0. Its geometric volume is stated at 12100 liters.
Ans.
The Venus 6.0 lists a shell thickness of 5-6 mm. Compare data does not give a shell thickness figure for the Conmat MR 70C, so that detail cannot be compared directly.
Ans.
It uses a drum drive built around Rexroth, PMP, or EATON components. The Conmat MR 70C instead uses a slave engine for its drum drive.
Ans.
The Venus 6.0 states a water line volume of 7500 liters. Compare data does not provide a matching figure for the Conmat MR 70C.
Ans.
It can be, since a slave engine drum drive is generally seen as more fuel efficient than some alternative setups. Compare data does not give exact fuel figures for either machine, so treat this as a general point, not a guaranteed saving.
Venus 6.0 Vs Conmat MR 70C - Compare Price & Availability Across 600+ Locations in India
Compare Venus 6.0 Vs Conmat MR 70C price and availability across all major cities in India including Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur, Guwahati, and 600+ more locations.
Desi Machines is a platform where you can see and compare construction equipment. It showcases images, brochures, features, technical specifications, brand details & dealer information. All these are taken from respective brand websites, brochures, and other public resources. We do not claim ownership of these materials and strive to ensure their accuracy. However, the disparity may happen and we advise users to verify directly with respective brands and dealers. Desi Machines is not liable for any inaccuracies or reliance on the information provided. Use of this website is at your own discretion.
Excavator
294 models 
Backhoe Loader
51 models 
Crane
68 models 
Concrete Mixer
79 models 
Wheel Loader
54 models 
Compactor / Roller
45 models 
Motor Grader
42 models 
Concrete Pump
66 models 
Skid Steer Loader
11 models 
Telehandler
13 models 
