Macons M6TM VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Macons M6TM vs Conmat MR 60C: the two differ on 25 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Macons Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Mixer Weight (3950 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (11900 L vs 11100 L), Filling Ratio (50.40% vs 54%). The other 16 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Macons M6TM

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3950 kg
Capacity

11900 L
Filling Ratio

50.40%
Water Tank

600 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 60C

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

11100 L
Filling Ratio

54%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Macons M6TM vs Conmat MR 60C

25 specs differ, 16 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Macons M6TM	Conmat MR 60C
Brand	Macons Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Mixer Weight	3950 kg	3850 kg
Capacity	11900 L	11100 L
Filling Ratio	50.40%	54%
Water Tank	600 L	450 L
Drum Drive	Hydrostatic	P.T.O. /Slave Engine
Water Line Volume	7200 L	NA
Drum diameter	2300 mm	2267 mm

See all 25 differences ↓

Macons M6TM price & full specs →Conmat MR 60C price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Macons M6TM VS Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Macons M6TM

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 60C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Macons M6TM	Conmat MR 60C

Conmat MR 60C vs Macons M6TM: which 6 m³ transit mixer fits your fleet

Both the Conmat MR 60C and the Macons M6TM carry the same 6.0 m³ nominal load, so the real choice comes down to how each drum is driven. The M6TM runs a hydrostatic drum drive with a 110 HP engine, which gives smoother, steadier mixing on long hauls. The MR 60C uses a P.T.O./slave engine setup with a 70 HP engine, a simpler system that most truck mechanics in small towns already know how to fix.

Water tank size is another gap worth checking before you buy: the M6TM carries 600 L against 450 L on the MR 60C, useful if your sites need extra water for washdown or slump correction. A fleet-rental buyer running long RMC routes may lean toward the M6TM for the smoother drive, while an owner-operator working closer to town may prefer the MR 60C for cheaper, easier local service. Read more in this concrete mixer guide or browse the full transit mixer range.

Macons M6TM Transit Mixer

Pros:

Nominal capacity of 6.0 m³ suitable for mid-sized infrastructure
Mixer Weight (Empty) of 3950 kg indicates robust construction
Higher water tank capacity of 600 L for better convenience
Powerful engine with 110 HP ensuring efficient performance
Hydrostatic drum drive for smoother operations

Cons:

Higher empty weight could impact fuel efficiency
Specific details such as Shell Thickness and Mixer Weight with Concrete not provided
Water meter scale information is missing

Conmat MR 60C Transit Mixer

Pros:

Nominal capacity of 6.0 m³ suitable for concrete transport on regional projects
Slightly lighter with an empty weight of 3850 kg
Optimal filling ratio of 54% for efficient concrete mixing
Utilizes P.T.O./Slave Engine for the drum drive

Cons:

Lower engine power at 70 HP which may affect performance
Smaller water tank capacity of 450 L
Details such as the length of Mixer Sub-Frame, Over Hang, Water Pump Pressure, and Water Pump Outlet not provided

Closing Recommendation

Both mixers carry the same 6.0 m³ load, so pick based on drive type and service support near your routes. So match the machine to your work: Macons M6TM for smoother hydrostatic drive on long RMC hauls, Conmat MR 60C for simpler P.T.O. drive and easier local service on short routes.