Macons M6TM VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Macons M6TM vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 27 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Macons Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3950 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (11900 L vs 12100 L). The other 14 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Macons M6TM

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3950 kg
Capacity

11900 L
Filling Ratio

50.40%
Water Tank

600 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70C

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

57.80%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Macons M6TM vs Conmat MR 70C

27 specs differ, 14 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Macons M6TM	Conmat MR 70C
Brand	Macons Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Drum Size	6.0 m³	7.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3950 kg	3850 kg
Capacity	11900 L	12100 L
Filling Ratio	50.40%	57.80%
Water Tank	600 L	450 L
Drum Drive	Hydrostatic	Slave Engine
Water Line Volume	7200 L	NA

See all 27 differences ↓

Macons M6TM price & full specs →Conmat MR 70C price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Macons M6TM VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Macons M6TM

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 70C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Macons M6TM	Conmat MR 70C

Conmat MR 70C vs Macons M6TM: Which Transit Mixer Fits Your Project?

Both these transit mixers carry ready-mixed concrete from the batching plant to the pour site, but they are built around different strengths. The Conmat MR 70C carries a bigger drum load, so it can move more concrete in each trip. The Macons M6TM runs more engine power and uses a hydrostatic drum drive, which keeps the mix turning steadily even on tougher routes to the pour site.

If your project needs bigger loads moved in fewer trips, the Conmat MR 70C's drum capacity helps. If your route to the pour site is rough or hilly, the Macons M6TM's engine power and steady drum drive keep the concrete mixing well on the way there. Compare all transit mixers and concrete mixers, or read the concrete mixer buying guide to understand drum drive types before you choose.

Conmat MR 70C

Pros:

Nominal capacity of 7.0 cu m may cater to larger construction needs
Engine power of 70 HP is efficient for steady operations
Large water tank capacity of 450 L aids in concrete mixing process

Cons:

Mixer length and other dimensions are not fully specified
Absence of specifications on shell thickness and concrete weight

Macons M6TM

Pros:

Hydrostatic drum drive can lead to consistent and efficient mixing
Higher engine power of 110 HP can handle more demanding conditions
Comes with detailed specifications including sub-frame length and overhang

Cons:

Lower nominal filling capacity of 6.0 m³ might limit the batch size
Higher empty weight of 3950 kg could potentially reduce efficiency

Closing Recommendation

The Conmat MR 70C and Macons M6TM are both solid transit mixers built for slightly different jobs. Choose the Conmat MR 70C if your project needs bigger loads moved in fewer trips. Choose the Macons M6TM if your route to the pour site is rough or hilly and you want more engine power and a steady hydrostatic drum drive. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for bigger loads in fewer trips, Macons M6TM for tougher routes needing steady mixing.