Sunbeam 65 VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Sunbeam 65 vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 27 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Sunbeam Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Drum Size (6.0 m³ vs 7.0 m³), Mixer Weight (3640 kg vs 3850 kg), Capacity (10580 L vs 12100 L). The other 14 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Sunbeam 65

Drum Size

6.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3640 kg
Capacity

10580 L
Filling Ratio

57%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70C

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

57.80%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Sunbeam 65 vs Conmat MR 70C

27 specs differ, 14 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Sunbeam 65	Conmat MR 70C
Brand	Sunbeam Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Drum Size	6.0 m³	7.0 m³
Mixer Weight	3640 kg	3850 kg
Capacity	10580 L	12100 L
Filling Ratio	57%	57.80%
Drum Drive	Slave Engine/PTO Option	Slave Engine
Shell Thickness	3-4-5-6 mm	NA
Drum diameter	2200 mm	2267 mm

See all 27 differences ↓

Sunbeam 65 price & full specs →Conmat MR 70C price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Sunbeam 65 VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Sunbeam 65

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 70C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Sunbeam 65	Conmat MR 70C

Conmat MR 70C vs Sunbeam 65: engine clarity against build options

The Conmat MR 70C carries 7.0 cubic metres of concrete and runs on a named Kirloskar HA 494 engine, so a mechanic anywhere can source spare parts without guessing the make. The Sunbeam 65 carries 6.0 cubic metres and comes with shell thickness choices from 3 to 6 mm along with a marked water meter scale, letting a buyer pick drum toughness to match how rough the site roads are.

An EPC contractor running a mixer daily on tight schedules often values the Conmat's known engine make for fast parts sourcing. A buyer working on abrasive sites, such as broken or unpaved roads, may prefer the Sunbeam 65's thicker shell option for a longer drum life before major repair. See our concrete mixer buying guide or browse the full range of concrete mixers.

Sunbeam 65

Pros:

Has a nominal filling capacity suitable for mid-sized projects (6.0 m³)
Offers a variety of shell thickness options for different durability needs (3-4-5-6 mm)
Includes a water meter scale (0-450 L) aiding in precise water addition

Cons:

Less geometric volume compared to Conmat MR 70C (10580 L vs. 12100 L)
Shorter mixer length compared to Conmat MR 70C may affect concrete output per trip
Manufacturer's engine make not provided

Conmat MR 70C

Pros:

Slightly higher nominal filling capacity than Sunbeam 65 (7.0 m³)
Greater geometric volume may result in more concrete per load (12100 L)
Known engine make (Kirloskar HA 494) which may ease serviceability and repair

Cons:

Several specification details not available (e.g., shell thickness, water pump pressure)
Heavier mixer weight when empty compared to Sunbeam 65 (3850 kg vs. 3640 kg)
Absence of water pump pressure and outlet details could affect water system evaluation

Closing Recommendation

Both are solid mid-size mixers, but they help with different worries. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C where fast parts sourcing on a known engine matters most, Sunbeam 65 where shell durability and clear water metering matter more.