Sunbeam 65 XL VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Sunbeam 65 XL vs Conmat MR 70C: the two differ on 23 of 41 listed specs. The main differences are Brand (Sunbeam Transit mixer vs Conmat Transit mixer), Mixer Weight (3940 kg vs 3850 kg), Filling Ratio (58% vs 57.80%), Drum Drive (Slave Engine/PTO Option vs Slave Engine). The other 18 specs are the same.

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Price Available Soon^*

Sunbeam 65 XL

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3940 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

58%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Price Available Soon^*

Conmat MR 70C

Drum Size

7.0 m³
Mixer Weight

3850 kg
Capacity

12100 L
Filling Ratio

57.80%
Water Tank

450 L
RPM

0-14 rpm

Standard Transit Mixer

Add a third machine

What's different: Sunbeam 65 XL vs Conmat MR 70C

23 specs differ, 18 are identical. The full tables are below.

Spec	Sunbeam 65 XL	Conmat MR 70C
Brand	Sunbeam Transit mixer	Conmat Transit mixer
Mixer Weight	3940 kg	3850 kg
Filling Ratio	58%	57.80%
Drum Drive	Slave Engine/PTO Option	Slave Engine
Shell Thickness	3-4-5-6 mm	NA
Drum diameter	2200 mm	2267 mm
Mixer Length	6090 mm	5840 mm
Mixer Width	2300 mm	2350 mm

See all 23 differences ↓

Sunbeam 65 XL price & full specs →Conmat MR 70C price & full specs →

* Ex-factory price ranges are indicative for Sep 2026 and change with variant, city and offers; confirm with the dealer. On-road cost adds transport, RTO, insurance and accessories. Disclaimer

The comparisons provided are based on the technical specifications published by the respective OEMs on their official websites and brochures. Please confirm these details directly with the OEMs before making any final decision.

Sunbeam 65 XL VS Conmat MR 70C Transit Mixer

Specs from OEM brochures · comparison updated Aug 2026

Sunbeam 65 XL

Price Available Soon

Conmat MR 70C

Price Available Soon

Particulars	Sunbeam 65 XL	Conmat MR 70C

Conmat MR 70C vs Sunbeam 65 XL: Which Transit Mixer to Choose?

The Conmat MR 70C and the Sunbeam 65 XL both carry a 7.0 cubic metre load, built for steady, everyday concrete transport. The Conmat MR 70C runs a Kirloskar HA 494 engine and suits balanced urban work, while the Sunbeam 65 XL publishes more detailed specs, including sub-frame length, graded shell thickness, and a choice of drum drive.

A contractor who wants a known engine make and steady urban performance will lean toward the Conmat MR 70C, since a familiar engine can be easier to service and source parts for locally. A contractor who wants more detailed build specs and flexible drum drive options will lean toward the Sunbeam 65 XL. Browse the full transit mixer range or read our concrete mixer buying guide for more help choosing.

Conmat MR 70C

Pros:

Designed for steady operations
Suitable for balancing output and urban mobility
Nominal capacity of 7.0 m³ matches industry needs
Engine make provided: Kirloskar HA 494

Cons:

Length of Mixer Sub-Frame not available
Over Hang details not available
Shell Thickness not specified
Missing weight with concrete

Sunbeam 65 XL

Pros:

Ideal for efficient concrete transport with higher daily output
Length of Mixer Sub-Frame specified: 5016 mm
Shell Thickness detailed: 3-4-5-6 mm
Water Pump Pressure and Outlet details provided
Offers Water Meter Scale 0-450 L
Drum Drive includes Slave Engine/PTO Option

Cons:

Mixer Width is slightly narrower compared to Conmat MR 70C
Engine make not specified

Closing Recommendation

Both mixers carry the same 7.0 cubic metre load, so the real difference is in the details. Choose the Conmat MR 70C if a known engine make and steady urban performance matter most to you. Choose the Sunbeam 65 XL if you want more detailed build specs and the choice of drum drive setup. So match the machine to your work: Conmat MR 70C for steady urban routes, Sunbeam 65 XL for buyers wanting detailed specs and drive options.